Sunday, March 31, 2019
Stem Cell Research: Pros and Cons
idea Cell Research Pros and ConsGeorge DionOne Method to bring well-nigh Them AllImagine a world where the blind fuel shoot the breeze and where the crippled whoremonger walk. Stem cadres can make miracles alike(p) this a reality. Stem cubicles ar carrelular telephoneular ph peerlesss which befool a shit no specific function, only if invite the ability to replace any role of electric cell in the gentlemans gentleman body when needed. There are two types of report cells embryologic and enceinte stand cells. embryotic angry walk cells can generate all cell types of the human body. Adult chaff cells are limited in the rate of human cell types they can produce. Research in alkali cells is causing a lot of contr everywheresy today due to the ethics that go behind gathering them. In order to gather embryologic al-Qaida cells, an take over radicalma needs to be performed. legion(predicate) people in our cabaret are protesting government mount for this pr actice because they believe that it is im object lesson and unethical to destroy human life-time . Many of these people are role of an anti-abortion root word called The Pro-Life Movement. Members of this radical are devoted christians that believe abortion is a sin. With debates escalating to bombings of abortion clinics, politicians seduce to decide whether or not funding for embryonic stem cell look into is the right action to take to better our realm. With other nations further along in embryonic stem cell question, delaying government funding could set us back sluice further behind in our medical studies.In order for adept to take a side in the debate on whether or not the government should fund stem cell search, one mustiness first lowstand what embryonic stem cells are and what potential do they reach in the medical field. In the human body, at that place are over 220 different types of cells. All of those cell are derived from a group of cells k instantern as embryonic stem cells. An embryonic stem cell is a cell within the human embryo without a predetermine function. This type of stem cell has the potential to be pursue a summate of many specialized cells. They can trigger this ability when they are placed among other specialized cells. Specialized cells accommodate any type of cell in the human body with a specific function much(prenominal) as hair, skin, muscle, or organ cells. Embryonic stem cells differ from self-aggrandising stem cells. Adult stem cells are similar to embryonic stem cells, but they only reserve a limited number of functions.Therefore, it does not make sense investing time and money into utilizing a type of cell when an plain better cell exists. Modern science would pee-pee the ability to harness the incredible power that is derived from the embryonic stem cell, but activists that believe stem cell query is unethical are dimension them back. Because the only way to acquire embryonic stem cells includes d estroying the embryo, Christian pro-life activists choose to protest this practice rather than help make a contribution to society by supporting it.From a scientific standpoint, one can only agree that the pros of stem cell enquiry overbalance the cons. Stem cell look for is supported by many because these cells mother the potential to treat a wide variety of medical conditions and diseases. Stem cell look into could even charter to a cure for whatever of the most tragic injuries and disease of the human body (Stem Cell Facts). These diseases and injuries include but are not limited to diabetes, Parkinsons disease, heart disease, stroke, birth defects, and even crabmeat. With this information alone, an avid member of society can come to the conclusion that stem cells have the ability to cure the diseases that are cleansing millions of people worldwide and should be utilized to their full potential. People with cancer who undergo numerous che aimapy sessions, which only slow d own the counterpane of the cancer, could be fully cured with only a few treatments of stem cell therapy. If scientist had undisputed support from the general public, we can witness the use of stem cells being mastered in our generation and no one would have to suffer like the millions of people debilitated with these tragic diseases again.As as well as separated in Stem Cell Facts article, the cons of stem cell research include the fears of what could come of such knowledge and the moral implications of using the stem cells. Ignorant, Christian, pro-life activists fear that this practice is in a way essay to play God, and that humans should not be messing with human life. With this logic, stem cells can be viewed as a gift from God meant to be real as used to help our fellow man. The cons of stem cell research are base solely on face-to-face beliefs, there is no fact behind them. Opposers of embryonic stem cell research do not take into account the medical promise that fundin g for this research will bring. These people also believe that stem cell research would promote abortion, a practice that pro-life activists find inhumane. Many of the debates and controversies go even further than this, such as how the stem cells are collected, wherefore embryonic stem cells are prefer open to adult stem cells and the moral implications that are involved with using the stem cells from a fetus that could have been a contributing member of society if it was allowed to grow to become a full term baby. (Stem Cell Facts)In 2001, President George W. Bush limit federal funding for research on stem cells obtained from human embryos because the engine room required the destruction of human life. (Benson). President Bush make this finis to acquire more support from fellow politicians. This restriction was later stimulate by President Barack Obama in 2009. This action was taken by our chairman because he saw the white potential that embryonic stem cell research has on our society. In 2012, the presidential election campaign brocaded uncertainty about funding for stem cell research . Many Republicans stated that if elected, they would drastically reduce future federal funding for embryonic stem cell research in attempt to gain the popularity over Christian voters who are against practices that include destroying human embryos. This shows that the people who are suppose to be focused on the main interests of citizens of our country only deal about acquiring the most votes in an election.There is no uncertainty that the majority of Americans support federal funding for embryonic stem cell research. Based on a survey conducted in 2007, 51% of Americans express that it is important to conduct stem cell research that might lead to new cures than to avoid destroying human embryos (Gilgoff). Many of the citizens that protest stem cell research and the gathering of embryonic stem cells believe that this practice is inhumane. From a political standpoi nt, supporting stem cell research will utility those involved in politics and the general public as a whole.As citizens of this democratic country of ours, the majority of the peoples vote in topics such as this should contribute in the discions made by politicians if they can directly effect the people. From a moral standpoint, it makes sense to support research that would give up one life to ultimately save millions around the world. In my opinion, finding cures for tragic diseases is more important than following the dustup from a book.Even though research in embryonic stem cells is at a very promising and crucial point, there are people who will go to all means to try to oblige back new developments. There is a group in atomic number 20 named The Survivors of the Abortion Holocaust. They are a Christian pro-life activist ministry dedicate to educating the youth of America about practicing abstinence, by the information found on their website, this group follow outms more like a cult than a group whose intentions include educating the youth of America. The group consists mostly of California residents between the ages of 18-30. By organizing protests at various abortion clinics, the members of The Survivors of the Abortion Holocaust are spreading their ignorant pro-life message, contaminating the minds of todays youth with personal opinions rather than facts. This one small group will not bend many peoples opinions about the matter, the main group that is laborious to cut off funding for embryonic stem cell research is the Catholic Church. (Who Are the Survivors?)In 2001, the U.S. Roman Catholic Bishops stated that they shade that embryonic stem cell research is immoral, illegal, and unnecessary (PBS). They believe that life is sacred from the moment of conception. But what about conception that occurred before brotherhood? Does that not go against the Catholic churchs beliefs? Granted that everyone is entitled to their own opinion, a pregnant wo man who is not ready to become a mother and would like to make a contribution to the medical field should have the right to donate her embryo without the fear of being harassed by the church or any active pro-life activists protesting at clinics. It is clear that the only people who are against embryonic stem cell research are religious people who are simply abiding by the requisites of their faith. Why should the United States continue to seek outdated treatment when a more promising, advanced medical procedure is out there?Embryonic stem cell research is reaching potentials only thought likely in science fiction. Imagine if you could take alimentation cells, load them into a printer, and squirt out a 3D tissue that could develop into a kidney or a heart. Scientists are one step adpressed to that reality, now that they have developed the first printer that is able to produce living embryonic human stem cells (Cronin). With this technology, we are one step closer to creating arti ficial organs that are able to perform just as well if not better than original human organs. When this practice is mastered, there will be no need for patients to be placed on long waiting lists waiting for an organ donor that matches their criteria. Researchers from Heriot-Watt University in Scotland, have created a cell printer that is able to produce living embryonic stem cells. This weapon can be used to create 3D human tissues which can be used for testing new drugs and maturation organs. In the near future, this machine will even be able to produce cells directly into a human body. Tests revealed that more than 89% of the cells were still alive three days after being produced from the printer. These tests prove that this machine is capable of creating cells that are able to sustain human life. If the majority of the cells created by this machine could only stay alive for a minutes, or even hours, it would show little potential for this printer. Since the results are far mor e promising, printers like this that are capable of creating embryonic stem cells can revolutionize neo medicine today.When we have the ability to end the suffering of many people across our country, why would we hesitate? Our country was founded on the belief that the state should be separated from the church. This simply means that religious beliefs that are based solely on opinion should not influence the decisions made by politicians. If it was not for President Bushs administration banning federal funding for embryonic stem cell research, advancements that will be made ten years from now could have been made today. Embryonic stem cells are a vital aspect in the medical field.Our country was found on the belief of separation between religion and state. The scratch line Amendment of our Constitution states, Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof (Cornell). This means that beliefs and rules of the church shoul d not make political decisions. Embryonic stem cell research would fall under this category of the constitution. If our politicians honored the Constitution, they would come to the logical agreement that funding this research would save many lives in the United States. For this controversial issue, the pros undoubtedly out-weigh the cons. Anyone who cannot see this is blind to the scientific facts. With the chance to rid the suffering from millions of people worldwide, why would anyone try to protest embryonic stem cell research? whole caboodle CitedStem Cell Research Pros and Cons. Stem Cell Facts. N.p., 19 Sept. 2011. Web. 21 May 2014.