Essay

Senator Robert TaftSenator Robert Taft s decision to speak up against the staging of the Nuremberg Trials in 1946 was a truly heroic action . Heroism always lies on the side of virtue , and in judging the actions of Senator Taft we moldiness turn up where true virtue resides in an American . We must examine the principles on which the American earth is founded , for a nation s brilliance is established through the triumph of its principles . In the result of the second base World War it was natural for a spirit of retaliation to prevail , and in such a climate the mankind would plainly support what was supposed to be fair trials that convicted 11 Nazi war criminals to finale . When Senator Taft raised(a) a lone(prenominal) dissenting voice against this orgy of revenge , he was universally vilified , and in doing so there is no interrogative that he lost forfeited his political aspirations But near commentators , twain(prenominal) now and then , state that he was correct in pointing verboten that the American record does non allow what took identify in Nuremberg . If America has won the war , it was certainly not for the despiteful spirit of its citizens , but for the principles of the nation that uphold casualness and justness . Senator Taft s is a heroic voice because he was reason subject integrity , the same which carried the soldiers to victory against the Nazi s . It is single cowardice to squander national integrity on the spinal chromatography column of the endorsement , when the spoils of war helped inflame our baser naturesEmerson implores us towards heroism , which implies that we should not go dancing in the weeds of peace , and should embrace both reputation and life in [] hand , and , with thoroughgoing(a) urbanity , refuse the blast and the mob by the absolute rightfulness of [] reference , and the rec! titude of [] behavior (Emerson 1983 . If we examine the actions of Senator Taft we will uprise that they accompany exactly with Emerson s criteria of what makes the true hero . He dared both the gibbet and the mob when he saw the principles of his nation world squanders by his countrymen in the exuberance of victory . He pointed out that the Constitution does not permit what took place in Nuremberg in the stool of a trial . He specifically points to bind 1 , Section 9 , which states , No bill of civil death or ex business office facto law shall be passed .

He argued that the judging of war criminals necessari ly entails the imposition of ex post facto laws , because [t]he trial of the vanquished by the victors cannot be impartial no issue how it is hedged about with the forms of justice (qtd . in Kennedy 1961 ,. 198 . Taft s vindication was found on the sacred inviolability of the Constitution . The urge of the moment was to shelve constitutional arguments , but Taft only expected to prompt his countrymen that they were committing a grave and fundamental error , to which end he position at risk his glittering political prospects . We... ! non the experiment Youre looking for? Get a custom (only for $12.99 )If you want to operate a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper