Anaximanes’ possible action that channelize is the profound ingredient is better than Anaximander and Thales’ infinite and pissing hypothesis because line of work maintains life on earth. For congressman in Anaximanes’ theory circularise is central to each nature. It is in the water and the earth. Also in his theory it sustains life. It is the learn dispute between the living and the dead. This Pre-Socratic’s theory is synthetical because convey is everywhere we know that from experience, we inhale and exhale air effortless it is what keeps life going. In Thales’ theory water is the fundamental element for practice session in his theory everything washbasin be veer into water like liquid, gas, and ice. Thales theory too seems logical in a sense that the earth is widen with seventy-one pct water, but water would need a component to transform into those three things. Air does that it can alter the waters form. For example when you put a cup of water in the deep freezer it turns to ice because of the cold air the water became denser.
Unlike the another(prenominal) Pre-Socratic’s who presented one element Anaximander presented “The absolute” meaning something more than fundamental produced it. In The Boundless theory contain iv elements which are air, earth, water, and provoke. In his theory in that respect is a process of warring opposites such as lively and cold, wet and ironic that was produced. They combine to produce objects of experience. Anaximander’s theory is similar to the evolutionary theory. His theo ry is not logical because fire has no prop ! being in fundamental elements. Anaximanes’ theory is significant because air does maintain life therefore his theory is better than Anaximander and Thales’ theory.If you indigence to get a full essay, inn it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper