Wednesday, September 11, 2013

12 Angry Men

12 Angry Men is a 1957 American promiscuous rein film. This film is ab disclose 12 jurors debating in a truly hot and uncomfortable room rough an 18 yr old male child who has been accused of stabbing and killing his father. jurywoman #8 the assumed protagonist streak the well slam police statement, Innocent until proven guilty. As they deliberate for hours, unalike jurors characteristics start to appear and begin to protuberance heads. In this paper, the plot, characters, ideas/thoughts/themes, wording/dialog, music and spectacle will be described. The characters in this film were rattling diverse and were from so many polar walks of life. juryman #1 was the foreman. He was the organizer of the group, and to me was somewhat nonchalant. He basically equitable wanted to vote and fuss it everywhere with, but knew he couldnt because he was in level of the whole thing. juryman #2 was a actually unhinged and nervous role of blackguard. In the beginning he vo ted the male child guilty, but by the end of the film his reasonable query had him opposed to that antecedent notion. juror #3 was the assumed competitor which fits his character very well. He was all for the young boys exertion the whole time until he glanced at a visualize that held some type of symbolism to him when he finally bust down and voted innocent. is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
Juror #4 the seawall Street guy was very analytical about his vote. For the most part of the characterisation he didnt sweat scorn the fact that it was extremely hot in the room and that he had on a full suit. He was settled that the boy was guilty until Jur or #8 and some others convinced him. Juror #! 5 was the adult male from the slums. He really didnt show his past, so you would fork over never guessed that he was. Towards the middle of the film he started to collapse out more and make his opinions known. Juror #6 was the gravely working gentleman. He was the one that was always quick to pop out mainstay at Juror #3 when he got out of hand. He eventually voted innocent also. Juror #7 was the erratic guy. He didnt care what the vote was, he...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment